New economy - new polity - the two are conjoined twins.
I'm all-in on anarchism, but your mileage may vary. In that case you may want to subordinate some tame AI to deep dive down on your alternative hypothesis. Butressed with incontestable facts you can't lose.
The same applies in spades to all Class Struggle and Soviet anarchist communists.
You think you're fucking good?
Better than cryptoanarchism!?
Prove it, loser. You do your worst. I'll do my best.
Before Nayib Bukkake there was Vladimir Lenin
Every provisional political set-up following a revolution requires a dictatorship, and an energetic dictatorship at that.
Source
The German
Karl Marx, NRZ 14. Sep. 1848
„Jeder provisorische Staatszustand nach einer Revolution erfordert eine Diktatur, und zwar eine energische Diktatur.“
MEW a.a.O. 5, 401.
Nadya Krapskaya - " After 1903 there was no democracy in our party "
Dictatorship is Freedom ( See todays LARB and the NATION )
Ignorance about the crimes of communists is strength.
Class War is peace.
Money is the root of all evil. The END is NIGH! And the community of women is terrible.
Btw Sonia Orwell had a strict Catholic school education.
https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/ch02.htm
The Communists have no need to introduce community of women; it has existed almost from time immemorial.
Our bourgeois, not content with having wives and daughters of their proletarians at their disposal, not to speak of common prostitutes, take the greatest pleasure in seducing each other’s wives.
Bourgeois marriage is, in reality, a system of wives in common.
Why Marx and his boss both supported free trade from the Corn Laws debate on and Mature Marx came out for money and markets
For these two German national socialists, the road to communist heaven lay through capitalist Hell.
" From each according to their gullibility - to each according to their greed "
https://libcom.org/forums/theory/labor-vouchersnotes-13032018
https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/ch02.htm
in most advanced countries, the following will be pretty generally applicable.
1. Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes.
2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.
3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.
4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.
5. Centralisation of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.
6. Centralisation of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the State.
7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the State; the bringing into cultivation of waste-lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.
8. Equal liability of all to work. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture.
In truth, the cravings of oppressors would be hopeless, and the practicability of war out of the question, if there were not an army of Jesuits to smother thought and a handful of Jews to ransack pockets.
https://www.reddit.com/r/CapitalismVSocialism/comments/7dwc4n/the_russian_loan_attributed_to_karl_marx_new_york/
The next Jewish loan-mongering concern is that of Königswarter, who came from a Jewish colonyin Forth in Bavaria, opposite Nuremberg, whose 10,000 inhabitants are all Jews . . ."
" . . . Meantime the Czar will get his fifty millions, and let the English journals say what they please, if he wants five fifty more, the Jews will dig them up. Let us not be thought too severe upon these loan-mongering gentry. The fact that 1855 years ago Christ drove the Jewish money-changers out of the temple, and that the money-changers of our age enlisted on the side of tyranny happen again chiefly to be Jews, is perhaps no more than a historical coincidence. The loan-mongering Jews of Europe do only on a large and more obnoxious scale what many others do on one smaller and less significant. But it is only because the Jews are so strong that it is timely and expedient to expose and stigmatize their organization. . . ."
German National Socialist, Karl Marx
(Hegel argues) was the absolute priority of the community over the individual. Hegel refers to it usually as the ‘substantiality’ of the polis or ‘the substantial character of ethical life’ in Greece. The ancient Greek thought of himself as a political animal by nature. He saw himself as a son of his city, a member of an ongoing and historical community and not as an independent individual, facing other similar individuals in an atomistic state of nature or some rather loosely structured society which they had voluntarily established. A Greek citizen was so wholly immersed in the politics and ethos of his city that he cared little for himself. He guided his actions not by his self-interest or some private conception of happiness and virtue, but by the traditional ideals of his city, which he accepted without questioning.’ One could say that he had no individuality in the full sense of the word; he was merely an instrument, a member of an organism, which acted through him in pursuit of its own universal ends.
We are accustomed to take our start from the fiction of a condition of nature, which is truly no condition of mind, of rational will, but of animals among themselves: wherefore Hobbes has justly remarked that the true state of nature is a war of every man against his neighbour . . . The fiction of a state of nature starts from the individuality of the person, his free will, and his relation to other persons according to this free will. What has been called natural law is law in and for the individual, and the condition of society and the state has been looked upon as the means of the individual person, who is the fundamental end. Plato, in direct contrast with this lays as his foundation the substantial, the universal, and he does this in such a way that the individual as such has this very universal as his end, and the subject has his will, activity, life and enjoyment in the state, so that it becomes his second nature, his habits and his customs. This ethical substance which constitutes the spirit, life and being of individuality, and which is its foundation, systematises itself into a living, organic whole, and at the same time it differentiates itself into its members, whose activity brings the whole into existence.
