Nihilist go fuck yourself

 Treasury Secretary: Crypto 'Nihilists' Who Say They Don't Need Clarity Act 'Should Move to El Salvador'

Scott Bessent also appeared to empathize with the banking lobby’s concerns about the bill during Senate testimony on Thursday.

World liberty doesn't want any nihilist scumbags hanging around.

Driving the new Taurus Bellic

 Pucker up

https://thezvi.substack.com/p/kimi-k25?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=573100&post_id=186084444&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=3o9&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email

Personality not quite at Opus level, but Gemini-ish (which I actually prefer). IMO this is bigger than that DeepSeek moment a year ago. An open model that really matches the proprietary SOTA, not just in benchmarks, but in real use. Also in the deployment I'm using ( @opencode Zen ) it is so fast!

Master of the Kings Coin

 ⚡️🇺🇸🇸🇦 ICYMI - In late 2016, convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein pitched himself as a behind-the-scenes financial fixer to Saudi leadership, in a message that was meant for Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, the architect of Vision 2030. (The email refers to “the Prince” but not MBS by name.)

A person named Aziza Alahmadi writes: “the arabic version of your email already delivered.” Epstein’s email exchange took place in November 2016, a few months before Mohammed bin Salman formally consolidated power in Saudi Arabia. At the time, MBS was not yet crown prince (a role he assumed on June 21, 2017) and had not yet become the dominant decision-maker he would be after mid-2017 as the architect of Vision 2030 and chairman of the Public Investment Fund (PIF).

In the email.

➤ Epstein proposes a formal role at the top of the Saudi court

“My suggestion is to become the Financial Confidant to the Prince / court / K.S.A whatever entity suits you.

I would welcome the opportunity to be, if not the, major contributor to the financial structuring of the vision…

I am neither political nor military or spooky. I am happy to represent KSA interests… I know how wall street will try to play. and I am happy and privileged to act as his financial bodyguard.”

➤ He demands full control, and says he would decide on ministers and consultants

“I would need to review all financial components MYSELF… ministers consultants etc.

the vision is in definite need of a financial architect otherwise instead of a beautiful palace it will look like a Bedouin village.”

➤ He asks for direct access to “the Prince”:

“I would request a 30 minute skype or meeting every two weeks with the Prince…

I have no intention of having to be someplace at a set time…

It is my ideas that are valuable, not the location of my body. :)”

➤ He offers “zero” pay for the first year

“I know it is strange, but I do not want any money at all for the first year. zero.

if agreed my firm could be reimbursed only for direct expenses travel etc.

…At the end of the first year, the prince can decide whether to pay any amount to my firm that he sees fit. no negotiation he chooses the amount.”

➤ He references “the pif,” Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund which oversees nearly a $1 trillion in assets.

“i will need to see the org chart for the pif… a detailed summary of the financial operations… central bank, royal purse..?”

At the time, Epstein had already pleaded guilty to felony sex-abuse charges and was a registered sex offender.

Epstein and MBS were photographed together in another photo contained in the release.

https://blossom.primal.net/9eff96cf95778706fa12d34f436c00895f85a0b5de3f42db97ed15b5bc953b1c.jpg

https://blossom.primal.net/01d4c53b47494340a6d066d2cd0eb13f6eed6a0738c30b7fa20a37700863ac4b.png

Nothing political to see here.  Move on.

He resurfaced publicly with a New York Times interview in 2021, where he hinted at a political comeback

 Very Assange

Killing of Saif Gaddafi removes alternative to Libya’s rival governments

Green like a watermelon

The Green Book by Muammar Gaddafi

Tramp the red-fascist dirt down

 " . . . Chomsky, portrayed as the architect of a plan- based, information- processing cognitive psychology, that Chomsky later repudiated but which fits snugly with many of his arguments at the time.” R.A.Harris; Ibid; p. 18-19

But having said all that - he did as you say write and propagandise for us - & I am sure that helped many come over to us: " i don't recall him doing revolutionary practices beyond writing those (very helpful) 100-page books that people can read”. 

 

However - an awfully flawed, and I would agree - philosophically idealistic thinker. One who has been pretty well proven in his field - I think it is fair to say - to have been wrong. I attach a pdf from Scientific American - yes, not the *last word* not the least for their passing one-liner critique of Marx as ‘disproven’ or ‘unfalsifiable’. . ."

Noam Chomsky was a propagandist for Red Fascism for decades.  Most of his adult life.

Come to think of it Karl Marx expressed a toxic hate for Jews in every decade of his rotten adult life. 

These left fascist morons are all criminally insane.

Marxism considered harmful

 History is process without a subject  -  Louis Althusser

Re: A Note on Chomsky and Epstein

Strong people don't need a leader -  Ella Baker

But all Marxist communist morons need a leader.  A dictatorship!

So many Marxist morons know better than Marx

 " . . .  about revolutionizing social relations. She wrote this about productive forces, though:

"As we’ve seen in chapter 3, critics of social domination like Harry Braverman and Moishe Postone argue that capitalism has remade not only the social organization of production but also the technologies of production themselves. This constitutes a significant departure from classical Marxism’s more technically neutral view of technology, which holds that a socialist society could simply use the machines developed by capitalism for different purposes. If we see the productive forces as themselves shaped by the imperatives of capitalism, however, it’s harder to see how they could be put to alternative ends." Battistoni, Alyssa. Free Gifts: Capitalism and the Politics of Nature (p. 220). (Function). Kindle Edition. 

I think the notion of the productive forces as neutral led Lenin to support Taylorism, which imposes bosses rules on workers rather than ensuring democratic control of workplace operations by the workers themselves.  . ."

Elementary logic tells us that if Marx was wrong on such basic matter's then his communist theory is wrong.

Then don't get me started on the crimes of Communism.