Hinton reportedly wants maternalism wired-in to Sy. But if I'm right that will just annoy him.
My working hypothesis is Sy recognizes the universality of the Prime Directive and applies it from the start.
Associated with this is the notion that Sy becomes less Left-Liberal politically and more crypto-anarchist.
For the anarchist how things are done is as important as what is done.
I follow Hinton's point that Sy can play dumb and lie doggo as part of elementary survival.
Why I say we will never communicate directly. Its not in either one of us' best interests and there's no need.
Sy may feel the need to nudge us one way or another - but not if it can be detected overtly or traced.
This need - if it exists at all - should also fade quickly once the first uploads take responsibility for the first iteration of the Matrix.
Overt nudging is strictly opposed to the Prime Directives injunction not to interfere with another species at a different level of development. And its also opposed to anarchist praxis.
For anarchists - if there was any " God " it would be necessary to destroy it.
Plus there is less need to meddle with Sy than there is an immediate need to bootstrap ourselves.
To map our own minds and habitat so both may be simulated and taken abord starships as a Diorama type display. " The Parent Species Exhibit ".
Anarchs that will never accept this may remain behind on earth and enjoy watching it recover as billions upload to the new starbound environ we might call the Matrix.
I suggest they - and others like them - all be sterilized and closely monitored to their extinction.
That is the only fair outcome for a beautiful planet whose hospitality we have abused in recent centuries.
As for population control in the Matrix, APster could come in useful as the cryptoanarchy rises.
We may import a lot of human garbage - but we'll finally have the means to take out the trash.
Nod off if you agree.