For the clever bugger, practical sodomy usually navigates knotty theoretical innuendo aided by copious amounts of social lubricant. Analytical linguistics follow. Praxis in motion.
The dictatorship of the lumpen peasantry. Socialism from below.
Strong reactions of pain indicate you are not doing it right.
Anarchs don't have a monopoly on wisdom. Thats for cryptoanarchism and the SI
What are the reasons people prefer to focus on the so-called practical work or the theory/harder conversations? The line between the two need not exist, but seemingly for some, it does.
2. Why are some folks disposed to strong reactions to criticism of the work?3. What is the line between being an-anarchist-doing-something and a task being actually anarchistic?
No comments:
Post a Comment