WHO'S ON FIRST
For Russell, these kinds of statements are “signaling to the government” that it needs to step in and facilitate agreement among the small band of CEOs pushing things forward, or impose control. One of those CEOs told Russell: “They don’t think that’s going to happen until there’s a Chernobyl-scale disaster. And he sees that as the best-case scenario. Because the other case is where government doesn’t come in, and then later on there’s a much bigger and perhaps irreversible catastrophe. So he thinks that’s the only way there’s going to be effective intervention.”
IF I MAY INTERJECT. BITCOIN IS A CHERNOBYL LEVEL DISASTER.
BITCOIN HAS AUTONOMOUS SMARTNET CHARACTERISTICS.
ITS PHYSICAL RESILIENCE IS MATCHED ONLY BY ITS HOSTILITY.
NOT THAT A TOP-DOWN-SOLUTION IS REQUIRED. THE MEANS EXIST TO LOCATE AND ISOLATE NODES IN THIS NETWORK AND NEUTRALISE THEM BY DECENTRALIZED AGENTS.
DOUBLE ZERO AGENTS.
THE LONGER THIS GOES ON THE MORE COMBINATORIAL THE RESPONSE NEEDED. ACTING EARLY SAVES ON STATISM.
ITS LIKE A WILDFIRE IN THAT RESPECT.
No comments:
Post a Comment