The scientific literature contains decades-old papers that detail fraudulent, unethical or merely incorrect results, but aren’t marked as such.
Many of these papers are long neglected, but their digitization enables artificial-intelligence tools that summarize scientific literature on a topic to feed misinformation to a new generation. This leaves publishers to wrangle with the question of whether these historical papers should be retracted or flagged as suspect — a task that can be tricky if authors are dead, original records can’t be consulted or journals are no longer in print.
A point in case
https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/
No comments:
Post a Comment