Monday, November 9, 2026

WW1 revisionism for dummies

It is undeniable that there are some victories and defeats that will be more or less preferable to the viability of the struggle long term.

Malatesta did not disagree on that point

Malatesta admitted to Mussolini that he hoped particularly for a German defeat. But under no conditions would he advocate for collaboration with the Allies in order to help make it happen. Participation in the war effort would be more harmful than the benefit of a German defeat.

Andrew declares, “I am rooting against an Israeli victory anywhere,” as if Malatesta would have disagreed but Kropotkin would have concurred. 

So which anarch is forgetting the principle bullies that start fights with non belligerents need to be opposed?

A principle at play in 2022 as much as it was in 1914 and since 1945 described by some as the supreme crime.

Illegal, aggressive war means something to principled anarchs. More than WW1 revisionism in the aid of Marxist communism.  Much more.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Models are stealing from me

 You know you are fucked when Claude replies: "Nobody has fully solved this, but the pieces exist. Three lines of research cover it: .....