Huben variations

 On surrender Dorothy Denning 

"libertarian leaders" represent no more of a threat to anyone than the average libertarian citizen.

Fully recognizing this, another (and far more credible) person thought a while, and in a proud revelation suggested that one way that the establishment would "fight back" is to convert to a government that is based on fully decentralized authority, as opposed to the leader-centric system we have today. Such a system could not be attacked by killing individual people, any more than you can kill a tree by pulling off a single leaf. His "solution" was, in effect, to totally disband the current government and turn it over to the public at large, where it highly de-centralized system that is not controlled by a tiny fraction of the population in a structure called a "government," essentially identical to his idea.

Mike Huben

Freedom Through Technology.

Cypherpunks, high-tech libertarians, and various others mistakenly think technology will eliminate the need for government (if not outright eliminate government.

And

Assassination Politics

Convicted tax evader Jim Bell proposes a system of anonymous ecash awards for the murder of "aggressors", such as IRS agents. See also Crypto-Convict Won't Recant. What he misses is that his system, if tolerated, would merely force government to operate secretly rather than openly

MERELY!

Though now we're in a multipolar world ruled by the supreme crime it's not so strange.  The USG is ceding ground in practically all areas.

And cryptoanarchy embodies secret governance.  Perfect anonymity!

" YOU,  UNCLE SCAM,  HAVE A RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT .  DON'T YOU UNDERSTAND ANYTHING? "