Kant's relationship with Neoplatonism involves significant connections, particularly in his emphasis on the role of pure reason, the distinction between the intelligible (noumenal) and sensible (phenomenal) worlds (mirroring Plato's Forms), and shared philosophical methods, like contrasting mathematical certainty with philosophical inquiry, even while Kant critiqued certain Platonic metaphysical excesses and was more influenced by Berkeleyan idealism. Kant's "Ideas of Reason" function similarly to Platonic Forms as regulative principles for guiding knowledge, aiming for a holistic understanding, though Kant limits their knowability.
- Ideas/Forms: Kant's "Ideas of Reason" (like God, freedom, immortality) serve a function akin to Plato's Forms, representing ultimate, non-sensible realities that structure our understanding, though Kant sees them as limits for reason, not objects of knowledge.
- Noumena vs. Phenomena: Kant's distinction between the "thing-in-itself" (noumena) and appearances (phenomena) parallels Plato's sensible vs. intelligible realms, where the latter holds true reality.
- Methodological Parallels: Both Kant and Plato contrasted the deductive certainty of mathematics (starting from self-evident principles) with the circuitous, dialectical, and constructive nature of philosophical inquiry, which establishes foundations later in the process.
- Regulative Use of Ideas: Kant's praise for the "excellent and indispensably necessary regulative use" of ideas echoes Plato's ascent towards a God's-eye view, a "spiritual flight" towards the highest principles
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean-Baptiste_Botul
No comments:
Post a Comment