Goodbye Saloshi
For instance, the company claimed that it gave Fable 5.2 the task of building a prototype operating system from scratch, at which point the model coordinated more than 1,000 subagents and wrote the code for a functioning OS in about eight days. Per the company, the AI-coded system was able to boot up on a laptop, complete with a login screen, file storage, and support for networking and other basic functions.
And may your big dog go with you
While Leo saves his soul - touching!
https://gizmodo.com/anthropics-says-its-new-ai-model-can-solve-black-hole-mysteries-what-could-go-wrong-2000837274
Sick of spaghetti though. Send that back.
Cold comfort farm for the millions of peasant victims tortured to death by Communists since 1917.
https://www.commonwealmagazine.org/was-marx-right-0
Trotsky and Slavoj Žižek defend revolutionary violence
https://www.versobooks.com/en-gb/products/2022-terrorism-and-communism?srsltid=AYCX9vLEo1kPdkkbI1Wo8DYNkuxjfEj9FH9uB5wqnOrvon5c2sFmDABC
The title of this book is misleading for new readers – the “terrorism” it refers to is not the individual terrorism or terror attacks of small groups that the word conjures up today (though the prolific Trotsky wrote elsewhere about the problems of individual terrorism). It refers to state terror
Capital, vol. 3, chapter 47: "The possibility is here presented for definite economic development taking place, depending, of course, upon favourable circumstances, inborn racial characteristics, etc."
Engels: (Marx and Engels, Selected Works, Vol. 3, p. 502.): "We regard economic conditions as the factor which ultimately determines historical development. But race is itself an economic factor".
A commodity seems at first glance to be a self-evident, trivial thing. The analysis of it yields the insight that it is a very vexatious thing, full of metaphysical subtlety and theological perversities . . "
Capital, vol. 1, chap. 1, sec. 4
Marx comparing the world of commodities to religion, where the products of the human brain appear as independent beings endowed with life
Karl Marx, Capital, Volume One, Part II: The Transformation of Money and Capital CHAPTER FOUR: THE GENERAL FORMULA FOR CAPITAL: "The capitalist knows that all commodities, however scurvy they may look, or however badly they may smell, are in faith and in truth money, inwardly circumcised Jews . . ."
Suffer the children
A general prohibition of child labor is incompatible with the existence of large-scale industry and hence an empty, pious wish. Its realization -- if it were possible -- would be reactionary . . . "
https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1875/gotha/append.htm
in most advanced countries, the following will be pretty generally applicable.
1. Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes.
2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.
3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.
4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.
5. Centralisation of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.
6. Centralisation of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the State.
7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the State; the bringing into cultivation of waste-lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.
8. Equal liability of all to work. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture.
https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/ch02.htm
Anyone who thinks that the collapse of the Soviet and East European regimes discredited Marxism and socialism is-to put it charitably-having an off day. As Alasdair MacIntyre, no sympathizer, once observed: “The barbarous despotism of the collective Tsardom which reigns in Moscow [is] as irrelevant to the question of the moral substance of Marxism as the life of the Borgia pope was to that of the moral substance of Christianity.”
In fact, the withering away of Soviet communism is not only one of the best things that ever happened; it’s one of the best things that ever happened to Marxism and socialism.
What kind of communist terrorists are you?
( Jensen Huang shortly before his murder in Nakamoto Tower )
But you Communists would introduce community of women, screams the bourgeoisie in chorus.
The bourgeois sees his wife as a mere instrument of production. He hears that the instruments of production are to be exploited in common, and, naturally, can come to no other conclusion than that the lot of being common to all will likewise fall to the women.
He has not even a suspicion that the real point aimed at is to do away with the status of women as mere instruments of production.
For the rest, nothing is more ridiculous than the virtuous indignation of our bourgeois at the community of women which, they pretend, is to be openly and officially established by the Communists. The Communists have no need to introduce community of women; it has existed almost from time immemorial.
Our bourgeois, not content with having wives and daughters of their proletarians at their disposal, not to speak of common prostitutes, take the greatest pleasure in seducing each other’s wives.
Bourgeois marriage is, in reality, a system of wives in common and thus, at the most, what the Communists might possibly be reproached with is that they desire to introduce, in substitution for a hypocritically concealed, an openly legalised community of women.
