researchers find image data occupies about 30.0GB onchain versus 27.8GB for BRC-20
https://news.bitcoin.com/bitmex-research-report-flags-brc-20-as-the-real-strain-on-bitcoin-nodes/
the analysts insist they do not endorse large images as “good” for Bitcoin. Instead, they offer a narrow takeaway: image inscriptions may slightly ease validation, but BRC-20 traffic is a concern for node resources via UTXO growth, even as both still compete with financial transactions for blockspace
Blockstreams position remains they endorse circulation of CSAM as a nuance of game theory. Like Bitcoin Magazine and Bitcoin dotcom.
No comments:
Post a Comment