Sunday, March 22, 2026

Is this a contradiction?

 Surge Protection not surge protection

⚡️🇺🇸 NEW - Chris Murphy: "The treasury secretary just said 'we're gonna escalate in order to deescalate.' It's like they've never read a history book. That's exactly what our leaders said in the middle of Vietnam, in the 20 years of mismanagement in Afghanistan. We need to end this war." 

https://blossom.primal.net/2b024f6162a5046527de87a6d16b49d16caa1c66c73faf8acd10437ebec5acb6.mp4

We are for the withering away of the state, and at the same time we stand for the strengthening of the dictatorship of the proletariat, which represents the most powerful and mighty of all forms of the state which have existed up to the present day. The highest development of the power of the state, with the object of preparing the conditions of the withering away of the state: that is the Marxist formula. Is it "contradictory"? Yes, it is "contradictory." But this contradiction is a living thing and wholly reflects the Marxist dialectic.


No comments:

Post a Comment

Stateless cosmopolitan missives?

 No. Intercontinental cuntish missiles ⚡️🚨 NEW - NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte tells CBS they “cannot confirm” Israel’s assessment that...