https://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2008/09/08/18534310.php
The KGB used to stage fatal car wrecks and Cuban Stalinists are notoriously sectarian and bloodthirsty.
Ask anyone!
Saturday, February 14, 2026
Chomsky and red fascist, Tariq Ali
These two royal scumbags appeared on KGB TV together in May 2012. They defended the fascist police state of Cuba together. The Franco friendly and Pope loving fascist police state of Cuba.
The DEA collaborator red fascist police state of Cuba!
Women and children last
According to the United Nations, 108 people were killed, including 34 women and 49 children.[4]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Houla_massacre
Its good Chomsky, Assmange and Graeber are dead.
Saves us having to kill them.
Btw, it looks like the Stella Kaine commando has struck again.
A sheik mentioned in the Epstein files has disappeared from X.
Valeria Chomsky's lies repeated at anarchist news
She claimed
Noam’s criticism was never directed at the women’s movement; on the contrary, he has always supported gender equity and women’s rights.
LIAR!
Let the record reflect Noam Chomsky supported rapist Julian Assange and this was after the Houla massacre.
SEE FOR YOURSELF
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Tomorrow
Assmange never sued anyone for calling him guilty of rape and he never will. He has similar non compos mentis to Noam these days.
Tomas Ibanez posing as a cop
If “we are caught between the arrogance of surveying the whole and the timidity of inspecting the parts,” as Rebecca Comay aptly put it, how does the second alternative (Foucault’s) represent an advance over liberal reformism in general?
This seems an especially pertinent question when one remembers how much Foucault’s whole enterprise was aimed at disabusing us of the illusions of humanist reformers throughout history. The “specific intellectual” in fact turns out to be just one more expert, one more liberal attacking specifics rather than the roots of problems. And looking at the content of his activism, which was mainly in the area of penal reform, the orientation is almost too tepid to even qualify as liberal. In the ’80s “he tried to gather, under the aegis of his chair at the College de France, historians, lawyers, judges, psychiatrists and doctors concerned with law and punishment,” according to Keith Gandal. All the cops.
Almost too tepid for liberals describes most of the collective at anarchist news nowadays. Meh
Tomas Ibanez is a fraud on the public
Foucault’s own elevated, encompassing awareness is impossible. This difficulty is acknowledged at the end of The Archaeology of Knowledge (1972), but remains unanswered, a rather glaring and obvious problem.
If Foucaul is the answer then what is the question?
And why does Ibanez hate our anarchist freedoms?
Foucault’s insistence on a Nietzschean perspectivism translates into the irreducible pluralism of interpretation. He relativized knowledge and truth only insofar as these notions attach to thought-systems other than his own, however. When pressed on this point, Foucault admitted to being incapable of rationally justifying his own opinions. Thus the liberal Habermas claims that postmodern thinkers like Foucault, Deleuze, and Lyotard are ‘neoconservative’ for offering no consistent argumentation to move in one social direction rather than another. The pm embrace of relativism (or ‘pluralism’) also means there is nothing to prevent the perspective of one social tendency from including a claim for the right to dominate another, in the absence of the possibility of determining standards.
Enter multipolarity red in tooth and claw.
Red fascists steal, lie and kill
But dont just listen to moi
⚡️🇺🇸🇨🇳 NEW - OpenAI sent a memo to a U.S. congressional committee on China competition.
They accuse Chinese AI company DeepSeek of secretly copying their technology using a trick called "distillation."
Distillation means: Ask a powerful AI tons of questions, take its smart answers, and use them to train your own cheaper AI getting advanced results without the huge cost.
OpenAI says DeepSeek accounts have been dodging blocks with hidden routers, automatic code, and sneaky methods to pull outputs from OpenAI and other U.S. models.
This breaks OpenAI's rules against using their work to build competitors.
It's supposedly helping DeepSeek improve their R1 chatbot fast and cheap.
OpenAI warns this:
- Steals from years of U.S. investment
- Could remove safety features from copied models
- Gives unfair advantage in the U.S.-China AI race
The committee chair called it the "CCP playbook: steal, copy, and kill."
DeepSeek hasn't commented publicly yet
https://blossom.primal.net/ead4b1e130060b950754b66c3d0ae82e4a322eec37d3a3b90d132ceaaf7123c5.jpg
https://blossom.primal.net/6f175fe3841f6821e9fad47a76c1f14a7c9ae2ef3645cda2a66cfb6239a42c85.jpg
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)